Our service areas

< Back To All Service Areas


Our firm’s experience as appellate counsel spans hundreds of appeals in both federal and state appellate courts. While most of our appellate work arises out of our trial practice, we are also regularly retained to prepare amicus (or “friend of the court”) briefs on issues of broad significance, to evaluate the merits of potential appeals, and to provide second opinions in complex matters tried by other counsel.

We have represented clients on appeal in numerous high-profile cases, and in cases that present issues of first impression, including the fiduciary duties owed by shareholders in closely held corporations; the assignability of legal malpractice claims; the standard for proving “defamation by conduct”; the standards governing attorneys in law firm dissolutions; the burden of proof in automobile crashworthiness cases; standards for expert testimony on alleged product defects; the circumstances under which an insurer may be found to have waived coverage defenses, or to be estopped from asserting them; the scope of the executive privilege as applied to discovery requests; and the parameters of the “discovery rule” as applied to statutes of limitations.

Representative Appeals:

Christensen v. Thornton, 83 Mass.App.Ct. 1133 (2013) (appeal from dismissal of claims in product-liability case involving industrial fan)

Regis College v. Town of Weston, 462 Mass. 280 (2012) (appeal by private college seeking declaration that proposed development of residential and educational facilities was exempt from local zoning laws)

Ware Real Estate LLC v. Town of Ware, 81 Mass.App.Ct. 1120 (2012) (appeal by town from trial court victory by owners of construction-and-demolition waste-recycling facility)

Osorio v. One World Technologies, Inc., 659 F.3d 81 (1st Cir. 2011) (product liability case involving "SawStop" table-saw technology and product "category liability")

Vargas-Rivera v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 79 Mass.App.Ct. 1107 (2011) (appeal from dismissal of case involving alleged electric shock from escalator)

Lemos v. Electrolux North America, Inc., 78 Mass.App.Ct. 376 (2010) (appeal from dismissal of unfair-insurance-practices claims against product manufacturer and captive insurer)

Davagian v. Cape Codder Condominium Trust, 77 Mass.App.Ct. 1104 (2010) (challenge to conduct of condominium trustees in conditioning disbursal of insurance proceeds on execution of release)

Pierce v. Pierce, 455 Mass. 286 (2009) (case of first impression addressing the effect of retirement at a customary age on the ability to pay alimony)

Hingham Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Mercurio, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 21 (2008) (insurance coverage)

Pierce v. Morrison Mahoney LLP, 452 Mass. 718 (2008) (business litigation - representation of former law firm partners in dispute over their partnership interests after their departure from the firm)

Bank v. Thermo Elemental, Inc., 451 Mass. 638 (2008) (successful pursuit of contractual indemnity claim and environmental response cost recovery action)

Friends and Fishers of the Edgartown Great Pond Inc. v. Department of Environmental Protection, et al., 446 Mass. 830 (2006) (environmental law – upholding groundwater discharge permit for operation of municipal wastewater treatment plant)

Safety Ins. Co. v. Day, 65 Mass. App. Ct. 15 (2005) (insurance law - estoppel)

Sevigny v. Employers Insurance of Wausau, 411 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2005) (reinsurance - insolvency)

Gillespie v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 386 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2004) (product liability – reversal of jury verdict for plaintiff in case involving alleged defective design of table saw)

Phelan v. May Dept. Stores, 443 Mass. 52 (2004) (employment - standard for proving defamation by conduct in workplace)

Grant v. Hexalon Real Estate, Inc., 51 Mass. App. Ct. 1111 (2001) (business interpretation of sub-contractor indemnity statute)

In re: Canavan, 432 Mass. 304 (2000) (product liability - standard for expert testimony in so-called “junk science” case, amicus brief)

New Hampshire Insurance Company, Inc. v. McCann, 429 Mass. 202 (1999) (professional liability - case of first impression addressing assignability of legal malpractice claims in Massachusetts)

Demoulas v. Demoulas, 428 Mass. 555 (1998) (business litigation - addressing claims of breach of fiduciary duty in context of closely held corporation)

Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Ass’n of Massachusetts v. Goldberg, 425 Mass. 46 (1998) (insurance - standard for insurer’s right to reimbursement of settlement costs)

Lally v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, 45 Mass. App. Ct. 317 (1998) (product liability - first case in Massachusetts to address standard for proving causation and enhancement of injury in crashworthiness cases)

Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc., 424 Mass. 501 (1997) (business litigation - shareholder derivative suit - closely held corporation)

Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Nonaka, 414 Mass. 187 (1993) (insurance coverage - standard for claim of estoppel and waiver)

Riley v. Presnell, 409 Mass. 239 (1991) (professional liability - applying discovery rule to statute of limitations in psychiatric malpractice clam)

Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, 408 Mass. 393 (1990) (insurance coverage - establishing as matter of first impression lack of coverage for sexual-abuse claim under homeowner’s policy and business owner’s insurance policy)

Meehan v. Shaughnessy, 404 Mass. 419 (1989) (law firm dissolutions - setting standard for duties owed in context of law firm breakup and related disputes over clients and fees)

Babets v. Secretary of Executive Office of Human Services, 403 Mass. 230 (1988) (pro bono, declining to find constitutional basis for or to create “executive privilege”)

Pollock v. Marshall, 391 Mass. 543 (1984) (professional liability/business - establishing rules governing business dealings between attorney and client)

McKinnon v. Skil Corporation, 638 F.2d 270 (1st Cir. 1981) (product liability - upholding exclusion of OSHA regulations and admissibility of UL standard as to standard of care, and addressing circumstances under which evidence of other accidents is admissible in products case)

Find a complete list of appellate decisions here.

For more information regarding our appellate expertise, please contact Susan A. Hartnett at hartnett@srbc.com or 617-227-3030.

Related News:

August 15, 2016 -
Twelve Sugarman Rogers Partners Named 2017 Best Lawyers in America
Sugarman Rogers is pleased to announce that twelve of its attorneys – over 70 percent of the firm’s partners – have been selected for inclusion in the 2017 edition of  ...
Learn more

May 13, 2016 -
Susan A. Hartnett: BBA Volunteer Lawyers Project
Come listen to partner Susan A. Hartnett talk about her experience with the BBA's Volunteer Lawyers Project Pro Bono Appellate Pilot Program, which provides legal services to eligible low-income, self-represented litigants ...
Learn more

August 21, 2015 -
Thirteen SRBC Partners Named to The Best Lawyers in America 2016 List
Thirteen partners from the Boston-based civil litigation firm Sugarman, Rogers, Barshak & Cohen, P.C. received top rankings in the 2016 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® for their skills and expertise in their respective practice areas. 

Learn more

August 18, 2014 -
Fourteen Partners Earned Title "2015 Best Lawyers" and One Partner Named "Lawyer of the Year"
Fourteen SRBC partners have been recognized by their peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America© 2015. In addition, David Barry earned special recognition as "Boston Lawyer of the Year" for Product Liability Litigation-Defendants. ...
Learn more

August 15, 2013 -
Fifteen SRBC Partners Named “2014 Best Lawyers” and Two Ranked “Lawyer of the Year”
Fifteen SRBC partners have been ranked at the top of their profession, including two partners earning special recognition as “Lawyer of the Year,” in the 2014 edition of The Best Lawyers in America. Best Lawyers is the oldest peer-review publication in the legal ...
Learn more

September 12, 2012 -
Fifteen SRBC Lawyers Named Best Lawyers in America
Fifteen of SRBC's partners have been selected for inclusion in the 2013 edition of The Best Lawyers in America. Best Lawyers calls itself “the definitive guide to legal excellence in the United States.” The publication annually ...
Learn more

September 09, 2011 -
Thirteen SRBC Lawyers Named to Best Lawyers in America
The 2012 edition of The Best Lawyers in America, described as "the definitive guide to legal excellence in the U.S." and based on a nationwide peer survey of more than 3.9 million lawyers, has named 13 SRBC partners to its annual list. The partners, and the Best Lawyers ...
Learn more

October 02, 2010 -
Eleven SRBC Partners Named to Annual "Best Lawyers in America" List

Eleven SRBC partners have been named to the 2011 edition of The Best Lawyers in America, an annual publication that calls itself "the definitive guide to legal excellence in the United States." This year's selections are based on surveys in which more than 3.1 million leading lawyers were ...
Learn more

Our attorneys:

Back to Home

101 Merrimac Street Boston, MA 02114-4737 V: (617) 227-3030 F: (617) 523-4001
Print | Contact Us & Directions | Site Map
© 2017 Sugarman, Rogers, Barshak & Cohen, P.C. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer